User talk:Andrey Korzun

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A plot from Russian life - Le Prince - State Hermitage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PetarM 17:15, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petrov-Vodkin's self-portrait (1926-7, Russian museum).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:14, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Peter & Paul Fortress 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:07, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malachite Room Interior details - vase.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:15, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Church of the Resurrection of Christ in Kadashi - Bell Tower 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:06, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Church of the Resurrection of Christ in Kadashi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 14:53, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Church of the Resurrection of Christ in Kadashi - Bell Tower 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:06, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Cameron Gallery - Bust of Emperor Septimius Severus (clipping).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 15:38, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Cameron Gallery - Bust of Emperor Hadrian (clipping).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 15:38, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Domes by city[edit]

There's no need to add Domes by city if there's category Domes in Russia by city. The same principle is used for all other architectural elements. --Orijentolog (talk) 19:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Church of the Resurrection of Christ in Kadashi - Domes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 03:45, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Church of the Resurrection of Christ in Kadashi - Cast iron fence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 23:36, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Cameron Gallery - Bust of Emperor Hadrian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:06, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Japanese Garden in Moscow - Autumn Colors 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 21:58, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Japanese Garden in Moscow - Autumn Colors 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 21:58, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on my QI nomination of Oct. 13[edit]

Dear Andrey

Thank you for your friendly comment. It was the very very fist time I participated in QI and you were a great encouragement. When I post the version without any watermark - should I post it on QI again? Or will it somehow replace the excisting pic by itself? Спасибо большое и всего доброго, Ivonna Nowicka (talk) 21:57, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! It is enough to upload a new version of the photo to the site and write a comment. I would like to wish you the best of luck! --Andrey Korzun (talk) 07:35, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Church of the Resurrection of Christ in Kadashi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  CommentMinor edit. Removed tilt to the right by 1 degree, slightly reduced noise, slightly sharper. --Andrey Korzun 09:12, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty good but it needs a perspective correction (not just rotation), the building on the right is leaning. --Trougnouf 11:12, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
-- @Trougnouf: -✓ Done-- I made a slight correction to the perspective on the right. --Andrey Korzun 09:46, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality, much better. It seemed to be leaning a bit still but my attemp at staightening it is almost the same as yours, I guess the buildings aren't perfectly straight. --Trougnouf 12:49, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
-- @Trougnouf: Thanks for reviewing. Yes, I guess. The building from late 17th century may have defects. --Andrey Korzun 13:36, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Thunderstorm - mouth Neva River 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:39, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Kunstkamera building 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 21:11, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Cameron Gallery - Bust of Herodotus (clipping).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:15, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Cameron Gallery - Bust of Metrodorus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 20:15, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Cameron Gallery - Bust of Metrodorus (clipping).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 17:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 SPb Great Neva Pleasure boats 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:34, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 SPb Azimut 70 Yacht 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:34, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 SPb Meteor 202 Ship 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 SPb Universitetskaya 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:50, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2019 Japanese Garden Moscow gazebo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Tsaritsyno Pond - Bird Island 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality and nice --Aristeas 09:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Japanese Garden in Moscow - Autumn Colors 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The brightness of the highlights should be reduced. --Ermell 18:53, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
-- @Ermell: Thanks for reviewing. Upload new version. Correcting brightness on highlights. --Andrey Korzun 05:27, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Better. --Ermell 20:05, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2019 Japanese Garden Moscow Chashitsu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 21:42, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Moscow Bogorodskoye Church 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Moscow Bogorodskoye Church 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:42, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Moscow Bogorodskoye Church Side porch 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Moscow Bogorodskoye windows 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Moscow Bogorodskoye Church windows 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 SPb Coast guard ship 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
QI to me if you crop on the right the piece of the second ship and the cropped crane --Poco a poco 08:39, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
*✓ Done I have cropped and uploaded the new version. --Andrey Korzun 07:34, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:55, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2019 Japanese Garden Moscow Yatsuhashi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Domob 10:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2019 Japanese Garden Moscow shrub pine 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:32, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:03, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Petergof Monplaisir 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Petergof Cascade Amazon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Petergof Fountain Sun 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Church Holy Trinity Borisovo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PetarM 12:43, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Church Holy Trinity Borisovo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:20, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Moscow Bogorodskoye Church windows 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:05, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Moscow Bogorodskoye Church door.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:05, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Church Holy Trinity Borisovo Porch 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 16:08, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Church Holy Trinity Borisovo Bridge 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:42, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Church Holy Trinity Borisovo 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:14, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Church Holy Trinity Borisovo 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:29, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 SPb Coast guard ship 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:18, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 SPb Mikhailovsky Palace 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:27, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:55, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Petergof Cascade Perseus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:15, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Petergof Cascade Aviary 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:15, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Church Holy Trinity Borisovo 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Domob 17:15, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 SPb Mikhailovsky Palace lion 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:28, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:00, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Petergof Cascade Ceres 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:53, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:57, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Petergof Cascade Pandora 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you please get rid of the cropped statue on the right --Poco a poco 09:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Poco a poco: ✓ Done --Andrey Korzun 13:43, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:24, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 SPb Mikhailovsky Palace lion 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 16:09, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 SPb Lakhta Center 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:14, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 SPb Lakhta Center 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:12, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 SPb Meteor Ship 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:27, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:10, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 SPb Gazprom Arena 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:16, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 SPb Gazprom Arena 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:16, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 SPb Western Rapid Diameter 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:16, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 SPb Lakhta Center 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 20:09, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:02, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 SPb Western Rapid Diameter Meteor Ship.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:29, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 SPb Makarov Embankment 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:30, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saintpaulia (cultivar) 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2003:C7:FF16:5741:3145:86FE:640:1836 08:53, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stamps of the Faroe Islands[edit]

We need images for Jens Christian Svabo (2010) and 2017 onward. Can you help with this? Please ping me. -- Valjean (talk) 14:49, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Valjean I'm sorry, I can't help you. Andrey Korzun (talk) 15:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Glass goblets has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


JopkeB (talk) 03:52, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 18:03, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 07:37, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 20:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 20:50, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 00:04, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 00:51, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 00:56, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Europa 1970 Yugoslavia series.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vanjagenije (talk) 14:51, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]